Employee Misclassification
Understand Your Rights.
No legal jargon. No attorney talk. We’ll evaluate your case and will give you simple, straight-forward and honest advice from day one. We’ll answer your questions and explain the law, so you can make informed decisions and evaluation your own situation.
Employee Misclassification
Understand Your Rights.
Contact us now
800.500.0301
Understanding Employee Misclassification in California
Employee misclassification is a significant issue in California, affecting many workers who are incorrectly labeled as independent contractors rather than employees. This misclassification can deprive workers of essential rights and protections under labor laws. To address this issue, California has implemented the ABC test, a stringent standard for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor.
What is Employee Misclassification?
Employee misclassification occurs when an employer incorrectly classifies a worker as an independent contractor instead of an employee. This misclassification can have serious implications for workers, as independent contractors do not receive the same legal protections and benefits as employees. These protections and benefits include minimum wage, overtime pay, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, and other workplace rights.
Employers may misclassify workers for various reasons, often to reduce labor costs and avoid compliance with employment laws. By classifying workers as independent contractors, employers can avoid paying payroll taxes, providing benefits, and adhering to wage and hour laws.
The ABC Test
To combat employee misclassification, California adopted the ABC test through Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which was signed into law in 2019 and went into effect on January 1, 2020. The ABC test is a three-pronged standard used to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Under this test, a worker is presumed to be an employee unless the hiring entity can prove all three of the following conditions:
The worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact.
The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.
The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.
Each prong of the ABC test must be satisfied for a worker to be classified as an independent contractor. If the hiring entity cannot meet all three criteria, the worker must be classified as an employee.
The first prong of the ABC test examines the level of control the hiring entity has over the worker. To satisfy this prong, the worker must be free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in performing their work. This means that the worker should have the autonomy to determine how, when, and where the work is performed, without significant oversight or micromanagement from the hiring entity.
Factors that may indicate a lack of autonomy include:
- The hiring entity sets the worker’s schedule and hours.
- The hiring entity provides detailed instructions on how the work should be performed.
- The hiring entity supervises the worker closely and requires regular check-ins.
If the hiring entity exercises significant control over the worker’s performance, this prong of the ABC test is not satisfied, and the worker should be classified as an employee.
The second prong of the ABC test focuses on the nature of the work performed by the worker in relation to the hiring entity’s usual course of business. To satisfy this prong, the worker must perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business. This means that the work performed by the worker should not be integral to the hiring entity’s primary business activities.
For example:
- A graphic designer hired by a marketing agency to create promotional materials would likely be considered an employee, as the work is central to the agency’s business.
- A plumber hired by a retail store to fix a leak would likely be considered an independent contractor, as the work is not part of the store’s usual business activities.
If the work performed by the worker is integral to the hiring entity’s business, this prong of the ABC test is not satisfied, and the worker should be classified as an employee.
The third prong of the ABC test examines whether the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed. To satisfy this prong, the worker must have an independent business or trade that is genuinely established and operational.
Factors that may indicate an independently established business include:
- The worker has business licenses or permits.
- The worker advertises their services to the public.
- The worker has their own clients and customers.
- The worker has the ability to hire and pay their own employees.
If the worker does not have an independently established business, this prong of the ABC test is not satisfied, and the worker should be classified as an employee.
Rights of Misclassified Workers
Misclassified workers are entitled to recover unpaid wages, including minimum wage and overtime pay, for the period they were misclassified. This can include compensation for off-the-clock work and missed meal and rest breaks.
Employers are required to reimburse employees for necessary business expenses incurred in the course of their work. Misclassified workers can seek reimbursement for expenses such as travel costs, equipment, and supplies.
Misclassified workers may be entitled to benefits that they were denied, such as health insurance, retirement contributions, and paid leave.
Misclassified workers may be eligible for unemployment insurance benefits if they lose their job. Employers are required to pay unemployment insurance taxes for employees, and misclassified workers can seek retroactive benefits.
Misclassified workers who are injured on the job may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Employers are required to provide workers’ compensation insurance for employees, and misclassified workers can seek coverage for medical expenses and lost wages.
Employers who misclassify workers may be subject to penalties and damages under California law. This can include civil penalties, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees.
Challenging Misclassification
Workers who believe they have been misclassified as independent contractors can take several steps to challenge their classification and seek redress:
Workers can file a wage claim with the California Labor Commissioner’s Office. The Labor Commissioner will investigate the claim and determine whether the worker has been misclassified. If the claim is successful, the worker may be awarded back pay, penalties, and other remedies.
Workers can file a lawsuit in state court to challenge their misclassification and seek damages. This can be done individually or as part of a class action if multiple workers have been similarly misclassified.
Assassi & Cruz Law has extensive experience representing workers in misclassification cases. Our commitment to protecting workers’ rights and holding employers accountable is reflected in our comprehensive approach to legal advocacy. Employee misclassification is a significant issue in California, depriving workers of essential rights and protections under labor laws. We are dedicated to advocating for workers and ensuring that employers are held accountable for their actions. Our expertise, commitment, and successful track record make us a trusted ally for workers seeking justice and compensation.
If you believe you have been misclassified as an independent contractor, we encourage you to contact us for a comprehensive evaluation of your case. Together, we can ensure that your rights are protected and that justice is served.
Contact us
